|
Cadmium
Telluride:
Cadmium Telluride - CdTe Ad Space Available Through the Renewable Energy Institute
The leading site
for Cadmium Telluride Information
&
To advertise on
this site, call or email
|
____________________________________________________
Cadmiuim Telluride
www.CadmiumTelluride.net
Cadmium Telluride:
CdTe - Ingredients
for a A Highly Toxic &
Deadly Solar Panel?!?
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Cadmiuim Telluride
www.CadmiumTelluride.net
Cadmium Telluride: Highly Toxic and Deadly Ingredients Now Found in Solar Panels?!?
by
A. Blazev
Cadmium is one of the top 6 deadliest and toxic materials known.
Cadmium is a metallic
element that is naturally present in the water and soil. A by-product of
zinc, lead, and copper mining, cadmium is frequently used because it has
highly desirable chemical and physical properties, including a resistance
to corrosion and chemicals, a tolerance for high temperatures, a low
melting point, and excellent electrical conduction. Tellurium, a
semi-metallic element, is combined with cadmium to produce the compound
cadmium telluride, or CdTe. 
CdTe is a technology of choice for use in thin-film photovoltaic modules because its physical characteristics make it an ideal material for the production of solar cells. CdTe has an almost perfect bandgap for solar energy conversion and can be made well by a variety of low-cost methods. Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) predict that small-area CdTe cells may reach about 19% efficiency in the next five to ten years, and modules will be available at a low cost to consumers. This cost reduction would provide a pathway for PV to become an important part of the world's electricity supply.
Although CdTe has tremendous value in commercial PV applications, some have concerns about health risks associated with its improper use in manufacturing and residential applications. Others share concerns about its safe disposal at the end of the PV module's useful life. However, the very real environmental and health benefits of using CdTe to make solar electricity must be carefully weighed against the perceived risks.
The above information from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory website
The RoHS Directive
Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive
The Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment 2002/95/EC ( listen
(help·info); commonly referred to as the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive or
RoHS) was adopted in February 2003 by the European Union.[1] The RoHS directive took effect on 1 July 2006, and is required to be enforced and become law in each member state. This directive restricts the use of six hazardous materials in the manufacture of various types of electronic and electrical equipment. It is closely linked with the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive
(WEEE) 2002/96/EC which sets collection, recycling and recovery targets for electrical goods and is part of a legislative initiative to solve the problem of huge amounts of toxic e-waste.
Cadmium
Behavior in Thin Film CdTe PV Modules
I.
Summary. Several US and
foreign manufacturers have started mass production of CdTe (Cadmium Telluride)
based thin film PV modules, and are planning to install millions of these
untested and unproven for this use PV modules on
While
using small number of these modules on a house rooftop, or a small commercial
site, does not pose any significant problem for a number of reasons, we
foresee serious problems when installing and operating CdTe PV modules in
large scale solar power fields, destined to operate 25-30 years non-stop on
II.
Residential and Small Scale Commercial Installations.
Due
to the fairly small amount of Cadmium in each CdTe module (avg. 7-9 g / m2),
it is unlikely for a small number of these modules to cause any environmental or
health related issues under normal operation, regardless of the operating
conditions.
Avoiding
direct contact
with damaged modules, and staying
away from fires involving CdTe modules would be enough to eliminate any
danger of environmental contamination or human health during the normal life of
the modules. Proper disposal of
these at end of useful life (as toxic hazmat materials)
is a must, if we are to protect the environment from unknown and potentially
damaging consequences.
III.
Large and Very Large Scale CdTe PV commercial Installations.
The
situation is totally different, however, when we talk about
1.)
Large and very large scale installations in
the 10-50-100-500MWp size,
2.)
Operating non-stop for long time (25-30
years),
and
3.)
Operating in the middle of the desert under harshest of desert
conditions.
Things
change drastically in this case, as follow:
The
behavior of CdTe thin films under harsh, shade-less desert conditions is not
well understood and no reliable scientific tests on the matter exist
presently. Nevertheless, we know
well that very cold nights, followed by very high daily temperature
excursions (over 100F range) play a significant role in the thin films
behavior and will affect their structural and chemical stability with time.
Thin
films of any kind (including CdTe and CdS) tend to shrink when exposed to cold
and expand significantly when heated. After
hundreds and thousands of these temperature cycles, accompanied by distortion of
the films and friction between them, thin films tend to
fatigue and show signs of mechanical deterioration and disintegration (expressed
as cracks, pits, particles generation, and delamination from the substrate and
from each other).
The
interface between the thin films and the surrounding layers is weakened
and even destroyed with time, and the films lose their monolithic
structure. All these abnormalities
lead to loss of power with time and facilitate chemical reactions, if and when
outside elements enter the structure.
CdTe
modules are frame-less glass panes, held
together by a polymer layer, which is not enough protection from the
elements, because it will decompose too, thus failing to stop the entry of
reactive gases to, and release of potentially deadly gasses from, the
Cadmium compounds in the modules as time goes by.
During
the long term exposure to the harsh desert elements (avg. 25-30 years),
moisture and gasses will penetrate into the module and react with the CdTe
and CdS films, forming different Cadmium compounds, which are less stable
and which might tend to outgas at high and uncontrollable rates.
The
immense land area, covered with these CdTe modules undergoing serious
mechanical and chemical changes through the years, might
become saturated with Cadmium vapors, thus destroying the environment
and life in and around these huge fields.
Uncontrolled wind currents might carry the deadly vapors to populated
areas and cause an even deadlier disaster.
A
natural disaster might break or burn the modules, which, upon contact with
the ground, will contaminate air, soil and water
in and around the affected areas.
An
extensive decommissioning, hazmat transport and recycling effort is needed
at the end of life of the CdTe modules, in order to prevent additional
contamination and / or damage to the environment or life.
1.
Cadmium is the 6th most dangerous, toxic
carcinogenic heavy metal on Earth.
2.
CdTe PV modules are a fairly new product, untested
for long term desert operation and have no proven track record for such
application.
3.
Regulations covering Cadmium and its compounds are in force in
some countries, but in the US Cadmium use is totally
unregulated presently.
4.
Tests done to date with small test pieces
do NOT address the issues at hand: i.e., large scale operation for 25-30
years in the high deserts of CA or AZ.
5.
CdTe and CdS thin films cannot remain
monolithic and stable for 25-30 years of non-stop operation under the
large temperature variations in the desert.
6.
CdTe / CdS thin films will disintegrate,
decompose and react with time, forming unstable Cadmium compounds, which
behavior is unknown and unpredictable.
7.
These newly formed compounds might outgas
with time, thus poisoning the air in the affected areas.
8.
CdTe modules usually are frame-less
structures of two pieces of glass, bonded together with a plastic
laminate material, which will also disintegrate with time and will
allow moisture and gasses to react with the thin films, while at the same
time allowing the Cadmium byproducts to outgas to the outside.
9.
Who is going to control the changes
in the modules, the potential contamination of, and outgassing in, the
environment?
10.
Who is going to be responsible for
remediating any problems, arising from damage to the environment or life
in the affected areas?
11.
Who is going to recycle the CdTe modules
at end of useful life, if the principles and / or their insurers are gone out of
business at that time?
12.
This is a big deal – covering thousands of acres US desert land
with a new and potentially toxic product. Why
are the principles refusing to discuss the issues openly, and assure us
of the safety of this product? Why
the mystery around it?
V.
Arguments:
Argument
1: “…one nickel cadmium flashlight
battery has about as much cadmium (7 g)
as
a square meter of PV module using current technology “(1)
Answer
1:
If we can visit a 6,000 acres field covered with millions of NiCd
batteries we’d be able to compare the difference.
Until then, this argument is simply irrelevant.
Argument
2: The material is bonded and sealed and, even if it were to be released,
it would be below hazardous levels (2).
Answer
2:
Agreed. Small test pieces;
no problem. But imagine 7.3 million
CdTe thin film modules containing 132,000 lbs. (60 tons) Cadmium, spread evenly
over 6,000 acres (as needed for the proposed 550MW power plant in CA).
Imagine a tornado slamming the modules into the ground and into each
other. Imagine half of the
modules’ thin films decomposing after 5-10 years exposure to the desert
extremes and outgassing through the cracked and porous encapsulation layers.
Just imagine Cadmium chunks and particles buried into the ground, and
Cadmium vapors carried by the wind to where the wind decides to blow.
Argument
3: Using a small amount of cadmium in a sealed PV module provides
substantial environmental benefits (2).
Answer
3: Agreed, small amounts are
of no consequence and the benefits might outweigh the damages.
But how about the huge amounts of Cadmium in the large scale power
fields? How about 132,000 lbs.
Cadmium spread over one area? How
about 6,000 acres contaminated land to start with and many more coming our way?
Argument
4: CdTe modules are reliable for long term operation.
Answer
4. Reliability aside, the
CdTe modules (like any other thin film and Silicon based) module will lose
efficiency with time. Approx 1% per
year (3).
Or 10% in 10 years and 30% in 30 years.
Or maybe more; there are no tests to verify that, so we can only guess.
So what is this loss of power due to?
Adhesion failure between the layers?
Disintegration and decomposition of the thin films?
Or all of the above. And what
would stop the thin films from outgassing?
Argument
5: Heating experiments to
simulate residential fires showed that most (i.e., 99_5%) of the cadmium content
of CdTe PV modules was encapsulated in the molten glass matrix. (4).
Answer
5: Agreed, the small test pieces
did not pose much danger. But how
about the results from a massive fire over 6,000 acres packed with CdTe modules?
NOTE:
“Pieces of commercial CdTe
photovoltaic (PV) modules, nominally 25x3 (75sm2) cm were used for the tests.
(4)”. 6,000 acres is
242,812,380,000.00cm2,
so how does a small 75cm2
test piece, tested with a Bunsen burner on a lab bench answer the question of
large scale installation wild fire safety. Apples
and oranges…?
Argument
6: CdTe is a strong and stable
semiconductor.
Answer
6: “It corresponds to the SIMS measurements, which indicate that
dopants migrate from the junction to the back contact and accumulate near the
back contact.” (6)
Such
drastic change in key performance elements is not a sign of a strong and stable material.
On the contrary; it is a sign of chemically and electronically unstable
one, that is looking for a stable chemical and electronic state, thus is prone
to chemical reactions.
Various
tests done with CdTe modules clearly show inconsistent efficiency and steady
power output degradation, which means that the materials in them are unstable
and are undergoing some changing with time.
On
the other hand Asbestos is even stronger and more stable material…but look
what happened when it was used in such a large scale.
Anything in moderation, they say. And
potentially toxic materials even more so, we say.
Argument
7. Cadmium is legal to use in
the
Answer
7: Yes, for now. EU and China
have issued restrictions and banned (5) the use and manufacturing of some
Cadmium containing products, which means that there is a problem that we need to
look into BEFORE allowing the installation of millions of CdTe modules on
thousands acres US land.
Argument
8. CdTe modules will be
recycled at end of life.
Answer
8:
Who is going to recycle them if the manufacturer and/or the insurance
company are out of business by then? The
future generation, that’s who! And
they are the ones who will cleanup the hazmat fields, UNLESS we make sure that
they are safe BEFORE allowing their installation to begin with.
VI.
Conclusions:
There
is a serious problem with a major PV technology.
A supposedly “green” technology, which, in our opinion, has the
potential of becoming deadly, if not taken care of, tested, proven safe and
properly controlled for long term use in large scale
operation in the
This
is a clear and present danger that has to be brought out in the open, addressed
and resolved -- BEFORE we allow mega fields of Cadmium
to cover the
The
biggest problem thus far has been the fact that CdTe manufacturers and
responsible organizations, such as: DOE, NREL, NIH, BNL, EPA, OSHA, CEC, ASES,
Union of Concerned Scientists and others are hesitant to
get involved in this debate, and prefer to sweep the issues under the
rug…until now.
Sweeping
these serious issues under the rug, however, will only postpone the inevitable,
making things even worse in the process. So
why not bring them in the open now, and address and resolve the most urgent ones
once and forever? While we still
have time.
Time
to act is NOW. Please take a close
look at this potential disaster, brewing over
We
must convince the CdTe products manufacturers and the regulators to bring the
Cadmium related issues in the open and tell us their side of the story.
We must come to an agreement with them BEFORE they mess up the
The
future generations will hold us responsible for this.
There
are solutions
that we should discuss with and
suggest to the responsible parties (manufacturers, governing bodies,
regulators, customers etc.), so we’ll continue looking for ways to raise the
issues to the attention of all people who might be interested and / or affected
by this potential disaster.
Please
take a close look at the facts herewith and on the Internet, and help us help
our selves and the next generations by avoiding another Asbestos-like debacle.
References:
(1)
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/fy98/24057.pdf
(2)
http://www.nrel.gov/pv/cdte/citizen.html
NREL Concerned Citizen
(3)
http://solar.nmsu.edu/publications/A237.pdf
(4)
http://www.clca.columbia.edu/papers/Emissions_Encapsulation_Fires.pdf
(5)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V2W-4R118J1-2/2/f6f29813299fe5fe50908788144a4604
(6)
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112098994/abstract
Why
is Cadmium being regulated?
http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-contamination/cadmium-contaminants-removal-water.htm
In
1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act. This law requires EPA to
determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do or may cause
health problems. These non-enforceable levels, based solely on possible health
risks and exposure, are called Maximum Contaminant Level Goals.
The
MCLG for cadmium has been set at 5 parts per billion (ppb)
because EPA believes this level of protection would not cause any of the
potential health problems described below.
NOTE.
MCLG for Cadmium is set at 5ppb, or 0.000 005g/l, or 5 grams per
1,000,000 liters
This,
compared with 8 grams of Cadmium content per each square meter (3 ft2)
in CdTe thin film PV modules.
You be the judge!
What
happens to Cadmium when it is released to the environment?
Some
cadmium compounds are able to leach through soils to ground water. When cadmium
compounds do bind to the sediments of rivers, they can be more easily
bio-accumulated or re-dissolved when sediments are disturbed, such as during
flooding. Its tendency to accumulate in aquatic life is great in some species,
low in others.
What
are the health effects?
Short-term:
EPA has found cadmium to potentially cause the following health effects when
people are exposed to it at levels above the MCL for relatively short periods of
time: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle cramps,
salivation, sensory disturbances, liver injury, convulsions, shock and renal
failure.
Long-term:
Cadmium has the potential to cause the following effects from a lifetime
exposure at levels above the MCL: kidney, liver, bone
and blood damage.
HOW
CAN CADMIUM AFFECT MY HEALTH? http://www.idph.state.il.us/cancer/factsheets/cadmium.htm
Some
workers who breathe air with high levels of cadmium over a short time experience
lung damage and even death. Breathing cadmium in air does not usually
cause immediate breathing problems or any warning signs. Therefore, exposure may
continue until serious lung damage has occurred. Most cadmium levels found in
the environment are not high enough to cause lung damage. Breathing lower levels
of cadmium over several years can result in a buildup of cadmium in the kidneys
and lead to kidney disease. It also can cause
bones to become weaker. If you eat food or drink water that contains
large amounts of cadmium, stomach irritation, vomiting,
and diarrhea may result. Small amounts of cadmium taken in over many
years may cause kidney damage and fragile bones.
Female
rats and mice fed diets high in cadmium have offspring with low birth
weight and improperly formed bones. Low birth weight also has been found
in women exposed to cadmium in the workplace. Exposure to cadmium at normal
environmental levels is not likely to cause low birth weight infants. Rodents
exposed to cadmium in air have higher rates of lung
cancer, liver damage, and changes in the immune system. There is no
evidence that cadmium causes cancer at the low levels normally found in the
environment.
European Cadmium
legislation 1 Information brochure
COMPANIES
IN COMPLIANCE
Cadmium
is dangerous to human health and to the environment. The Council Directive
91/338/EC
of 18 June 1991 prohibits the use of cadmium as a pigment, dye or stabilizer in
plastics and its use as plating on metallic surfaces. Companies can do much to
prevent the manufacture, sale, import and export of products containing cadmium
by means of selfregulation.
This
fact sheet provides details about the Cadmium Directive and how to observe it.
Chemistry
Cadmium
is a soft metal. Chemically it is classed together with zinc and mercury in
Group 2B of the Period Table. Cadmium is a by-product of the production of zinc
from its ore. Total world production is currently in the order of 20 000 tonnes
per year. Cadmium has many uses. For example:
-
in plating, to protect metals from corrosion;
-
in pigments and dyes as cadmium sulphide (yellow, red and orange);
-
as stabiliser in plastics to prevent oxidation and UV-degradation;
-
in NiCd batteries.
(The
most common uses of cadmium are listed here first)
Effects
on health
When
cadmium is released into the environment it can be taken up by plants, including
crops. The
Cadmium
has no known physiological function in the human body.
Growing
awareness
Following
the discovery of the causes of 'itai itai' disease awareness of the need to
eliminate, or at least reduce, the release of cadmium into the environment grew.
This is not a simple task because of the economic importance of the metal
itself. However, in the twenty years that followed the discovery of itai itai,
alternatives have been found for most cadmium applications. As of 1985-1990, in
view of oncoming european legislation for cadmium, the industry has started to
replace Cadmium-based pigments by organic pigments and the cadmium-based
stabil;izers, used for PVC, by lead or zinc-based stabilizers.
Directive
In
1991 the Council of the European Communities decided that cadmium:
-
may not be used to give colour to finished products manufactured from plastics
and resins (for a list
-
may not be used in paints. If the paints have a high zinc content, the residual
concentration of cadmium must be as low as possible and at all events must not
exceed 0.01%;
-
may not be used as stabiliser in products made from PVC or related compounds
(for a list see Table
II).
In these cases the cadmium concentration in the finished product is also limited
to 0.01%;
-
may not be used for cadmium plating of metallic products and components to be
used in equipment
European
Cadmium legislation 2 Information brochure
Polyvinyl
chloride (PVC)
Polyurethane
(PUR)
Low-density
polyethylene (LDPE)
Cellulose-acetate
(CA)
Cellulose
acetate butyrate (CAB)
Epoxy
resins
Melamine-formaldehyde
resins (MF)
Urea-formaldehyde
(UF)
Unsaturated
polyesters
Polyethylene
terephtalate (PET)
Polybutylene
terephtalate (PBT)
Polystyrene
Acrylonitrile
methylmethacrylate (AMMA)
Cross-linked
polyethylene
High-impact
polystyrene-polypropylene
Table
II
Packaging
materials (bags, containers, bottles, lids)
Office
or school supplies
Fittings
for furniture
Coachwork
or the like
Articles
of apparel and clothing accessories (including gloves)
Floor
and wall coverings
Textile
fabrics
Imitation
leather
Gramophone
records
Tubes
and pipes and their fittings
Swing
doors
Vehicles
for road transport
Coating
of steel sheet used in construction or in industry
Insulation
for electrical wiring
Exemptions
Exemptions
include the use of cadmium pigments and or stabilisers in products where they
are required for safety reasons. The prohibition against the use of cadmium
plating does not apply to products or components used in aeronautical,
aerospace, mining, offshore and nuclear sectors where applications require high
safety standards; and for electrical contacts, where cadmium is used to ensure
the reliability of the devices in which the contacts are fitted.
Several
Member States have been granted derogations from the Cadmium Directive to take
into
Derogation
of the Cadmium Directive in national legislation
The
national regulation Cadmiumverordnung BGBI. Nr. 855/1993 restricts the use of
-
production of dyestuffs, lacquers and paints;
-
use of colouring or stabilisation of plastic materials;
-
treatment or coating of metal surfaces
Under
the Chemical Substance Act the Cadmium Decree 1999 was issued to replace the
Cadmium
Decree 1990. It contains a total ban on the use of cadmium as pigment, dye
and/or
The
Swedish ban on cadmium covers the use of cadmium compounds as pigments,
stabilisers
These
include some minor deviations from the Council Directive. Further information is
Enforcement
Enforcement
of the Cadmium Directive is one of the priorities for the Chemical Legislation
European Enforcement Network (CLEEN) under the joint presidency of
CLEEN
In
1995/96 several Member States worked together in a project known as NONS
EuroCad,
set up to help to enforce cadmium legislation, is the first of these projects.
It began
co-operation
with customs; development of inspection methods; and desk studies
Compliance
Companies
must obviously comply with relevant national cadmium regulations based on the
Council
Directive.
They can also work voluntarily to restrict cadmium use and to prevent the
manufacturing
Environmental
management systems (
Responsible
Care. The chemical industry itself
has taken the initiative in establishing a systematic
Contracts.
Trading companies generally do not
have environmental management or comparable
These
documents should preferably contain the results of the tests carried out
according to an accepted procedure (see
Test
procedure
A
European Pre-standard procedure (ENV 1122) has been developed in order to meet
the
ANNEX
1
Example
of a contract
REGULATORY
APPROVALS
a)
All products must comply with any and all European Union and national
legislation, regulations,
b)
The supplier has to provide all documentation required by <company name>
or any European
c)
Without prejudice to the provisions of b) above, where products may bear, or are
required by law
d)
The Supplier has to ensure that all tests necessary to obtain certification
under b) or c) above have
e)
All product claims shall at all times be true and accurate. The supplier shall,
upon the request of <company name>, and as may otherwise be required by
any national or local government authority
f)
In the event that the supplier supplies products which do not conform with the
provisions of a), b), c), d) or e) above, these products may be returned to the
Supplier or the country of origin (if different) at the Supplier's expense. The
price of such non-conforming products may, with agreement from the Supplier, be
deducted by <company name> from sums otherwise payable to the Supplier in
relation to other products or batches of products, save that if the price
payable has already been paid, <company name> may require immediate
reimbursement of the sum, such reimbursement in no circumstances to take place
later than 10 days following a request by <company name>.
g)
Test procedure for total cadmium content in plastics
i.
In order to meet the European and national standards for total Cadmium content
in plastics <company name> has specified the European Pre-standard ENV
1122 procedure for testing of all of its individual plastic components.
ii.
The test procedure applies to all individual plastic components, paints and
pigments used in the manufacture of products intended for supply by supplier to
<company name>.
iii.
The level of Cadmium found in any individual component shall not exceed 100
mg/kg when tested by the method prescribed.
iv.
If test method B is used the watch glass should be replaced during all the
heating processes
v.
Where paints and varnishes require testing for Cadmium content an alternative
test method
vi.
Producers should also be aware that it is planned to introduce a new European
commission directive under the dangerous substances Directive 76/769/EEC which
will restrict the use of tin and cadmium in a range of plastics and paints.
vii.
It is a requirement that all items which require Cadmium certification (as
indicated on the purchase order) shall be inspected and certified per production
batch. A copy of such
NB.
No product which requires Cadmium certification may be shipped to
European
Cadmium legislation 8 Information brochure
ANNEX
2
Non-Cadmium
Declaration
Date
pm
NON-CADMIUM
DECLARATION
REF.
INVOICE NUMBER: pm
ORDER
NUMBER: pm
ARTICLE
NUMBER: pm
SHIPPED
PER M.V.: pm
We
herewith declare that the article or articles as stipulated under the above
mentioned
This
declaration also applies to: accessories and other additional materials (such as
zips,
The
results of the analysis are added as evidence.
NAME
OF LABORATORY: CERTIFIED BY <company name>
We
further guarantee that our company can be hold responsible and shall accept any
(
Name
of the company: pm
Authorised-signature:
What is the "Unified Smart Grid"?
The Unified Smart Grid is the name used for the future transmission power lines that would carry green electricity from the many solar power plants and solar power parks and wind farms that generate the power, typically in remote areas, to the "load centers" or major cities that would use the green power.
Quite simply, our country's out-dated and inefficient National Electric Grid, lacks the ability to carry all the new green electricity being planned from hundreds of new solar power parks and wind power generation facilities.
The Unified Smart Grid will be a national interconnected network relying on a high capacity backbone of electric power transmission lines linking all the nation's local electrical networks that have been upgraded to smart grids. Europe's analogous project is sometimes referred to as the SuperSmart Grid, a term that also appears in the literature describing the Unified Smart Grid.
Cost estimates to rebuild the nation's electric grid as a Unified Smart Grid have ranged from $350 billion to $450 billion.
Support for
the unified smart grid came with passage of the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007. Title 13 of this Act invested $100 million in funding for the
years 2008 – 2012 and establishes a matching program to states, utilities and consumers to build
unified smart grid capabilities. It also creates a Grid Modernization Commission to assess the benefits of demand response
and automated demand response and recommended a set of system protocols and
standards to be led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology which
would coordinate the development of smart grid standards. FERC would then promulgate
these standards and protocols for the unified smart grid through its official
rulemaking capabilities.
The Unified
Smart Grid received further support with the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 that set aside $11 billion for the creation of a smart grid.
Building
a Unified
Smart Grid
would
help jump-start the renewable
energy investments in solar power
parks. Thousands of megawatts of new solar
power parks (both Concentrating
Solar Power plants and Photovoltaic Power Plants) are being planned. Most
are located in the desert Southwest due to the solar energy resource. A Unified
Smart Grid
is
needed to move the large amount of power, which is fairly concentrated, to the
rest of the nation. Without the new Unified
Smart Grid, it
would be impossible to distribute the green power to the nation.
The new Unified Smart Grid is significantly more efficient than the present, nearly 100 year old technology that makes up our nation's present transmission and distribution network of how we get the power from central power plants to customers and major load centers.
Much of the new Unified Smart Grid will be comprised of "High Voltage Direct Current" transmission lines which is significantly more efficient than the present high voltage alternating current transmission lines.
The new Unified Smart Grid will provide economic development, thousands of new jobs, and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What
would the new Unified
Smart Grid look like?

Source: American Electric Power
__________________________________________________
For more information on the Unified Smart Grid, visit one of the following sites:
Central Power
Plant
www.CentralPowerPlant.com
Electric Power
Generation
www.ElectricPowerGeneration.net
High
Voltage Direct Current
www.HighVoltageDirectCurrent.com
National
Electric Grid
www.NationalElectricGrid.com
Transmission
and Distribution
www.TransmissionAndDistribution.net
Unified Smart
Grid
www.UnifiedSmartGrid.com
Wind
Power Generation
www.WindPowerGeneration.com
_______________________________________________________
You Can't
Have a Unified
Smart Grid Without:
Advanced Metering System * Advanced Meters * Automated Demand Response * Automated Energy Management
Battery Energy Storage * Building Automation Systems * Carbon Free Energy * Clean Power Generation * Cogeneration
Compressed Air Energy Storage * Decentralized Energy * Demand Side Management * Dispersed Generation
Distributed Energy Resources * Distributed Generation * Distributed PV * EcoGeneration * High Voltage Direct Current
Load Leveling * Locational Marginal Pricing * Micro-Grid * Net Zero Energy * Net Zero Energy Buildings
Nodal Pricing * Onsite Power Generation * Pollution Free Power * Plug In Electric Vehicles * Renewable Energy Parks
Rooftop PV * Solar Cogeneration * Solar Power Parks * Trigeneration * Virtual Power Plants * Waste Heat Recovery
_______________________________________________________
What is Engineering Procurement Construction?
Engineering Procurement Construction, also referred to as; Engineer Procure Construct, "EPC" or Engineering Procurement and Construction, is the terminology used when an owner, for example, is seeking to build a new cogeneration power plant uses when the owner is seeking a "turnkey" project solution. EPC contracts are not only a very common form of contracting within the construction industry, but increasingly becoming the norm, particularly in the electric power generation (power plants) and utility sector.
The construction company, via the EPC contract with the owner, provides for the design, engineering, procurement of all related supplies, components, materials, labor, services, etc. The contractor, with approval/permit by EPC contract with the owner, may sub-contract part of the work.
What
is Front End Engineering
Design?
Front-end
Engineering Design, also known as Front End
Engineering or
"FEED," is the preliminary engineering and conceptual design completed
in advance of the start of EPC (Engineering, Procurement and
Construction). Front End Engineering usually concludes with the
engineering firm's presentation of an Engineering
Feasibility Study or Analysis.
Front-end
Engineering Design includes a design team that includes and integrates
all or most engineering fields such as mechanical engineering, electrical
engineering, environmental engineering, civil engineering, power engineering,
chemical engineering, etc. The FEED design team includes the project
visualization and conceptualization stages, including "what-if"
decision making analyses, integrating the client company's goals, objectives
into an efficient and economic engineering solution.
What is Balance of
Plant?
Balance of plant
or "BOP," consists of the remaining systems, components, and structures that comprise a complete power plant or energy system
- not included in the prime mover and waste heat recovery (ex.
gas turbines,
steam turbines,
heat
recovery steam generators (HRSG), waste heat
boilers, etc.) systems. In solar
power parks, BOP is referred to as BOS or balance
of system.
Engineering Procurement and Construction or "EPC" contracts with long-term performance guarantees are becoming increasingly popular for some renewable energy technologies, such as commercial-scale photovoltaic systems.
Engineering Procurement and Construction contracts give the owner unprecedented assurance that the system will provide the long-term energy benefits advertised without wasting time and money with the Architectural and Engineering ("A&E") firm or expensive change orders that take additional time and resources to process and integrate. These performance guarantees cover the entire installation and go way beyond manufacturer warranties that only cover specific parts and not the system as a whole.
EPC and performance guarantee contracts can be a wise choice for many reasons. Oftentimes, the Architectural and Engineering firms do not have the in-house expertise to understand fully how to specify renewable energy systems. Due to the newer nature of these technologies and the rapidly developing nature of many technologies, this is a specialized field of its own for each renewable technology type. If the Architectural and Engineering company specifies particular equipment, while it may be feasible, it may not be the optimal design or the most likely to be available at construction.
EPC contracts also provide more flexibility in equipment choices that can reduce change orders and construction delays. For example, many photovoltaic modules change specifications and dimensions on almost a monthly basis. Even the oldest and most reputable manufacturers are working to keep pace with fierce competition in the field today. Given that the modules are the heart of the photovoltaic system, it reasons that specifying a particular module in the construction documents might result in a change order and result in cost over runs and delays by actual construction.
In an EPC contract with a performance guarantee, the contractor has a strong financial incentive to use the most reliable and highest performing equipment and to ensure the highest standards are maintained throughout installation and that any details that could influence long-term performance are addressed. Practices ranging from cherry picking the highest output modules to over-sizing wiring and conduit to improved operations and maintenance (O&M) plans might not be necessary for inspection or commissioning but can contribute to meeting the contractor's long-term performance liability. These same practices in turn enhance the long-term energy performance to the greater benefit of the facility and those that operate it.
Performance guarantee contracts attract top renewable energy contractors with long-term success in their fields. Less capable or experienced contractors will not savor the extra liability involved, nor will they have the expertise or even access to the top quality equipment necessary to fulfill a performance guarantee.
Certain provisions should be included with any EPC contract to ensure coordination and consistency with the remainder of the project. All contracts and subcontracts related to the project should include provisions requiring participation in the integrated design process including coordination of design with other related aspects of the project.
The EPC contractor needs to work with the Architectural and Engineering firm to understand the building elements that are necessary to the integration of the renewable energy system. In addition, an EPC contract needs provisions to ensure coordination with the larger project construction team. While coordination is important, this type of design and construction contract allows the contractors to do what they do best and frees more of the agency's critical planning resources for other aspects of the project.
Additional provisions standard with other construction contract terms should also be included in the EPC contract. These include requiring the team to perform enhanced commissioning over the first year and developing an O&M manual and training for the system.
Through a combination of EPC contracts combined with long-term performance guarantees, the construction relationship is transformed from being sometimes adversarial to being a win/win situation for everyone involved.
Engineering Procurement
Construction and
Front End Engineering Design (FEED)
and
Project Development Services
______________________________________________________
What are "renewable energy resources?"
"Renewable energy resources" include;
Solar Power & Energy (for homes and businesses)
What is
"carbon free energy?"
"Carbon free energy" is energy that is produced or generated without producing any carbon dioxide emissions. Even nuclear power plants generate "carbon free energy" along with the following;
Clean Coal Technologies (with Carbon Capture and Sequestration)
Coal Fired Power Plants (with Carbon Capture and Sequestration)
Solar Desalination (Clean Water and Clean Power!)
Energy Efficiency Measures and Energy Conservation Measures such as Automated Demand Response and Demand Side Management and Energy Efficient Lighting, while not "generating" carbon free energy, provides significant increases in efficiencies, thereby reducing the overall need for energy, which may come from central power plants that are very inefficient and generate significant amounts of carbon dioxide emissions.
Even nuclear power plants generate "carbon free energy." These are just some examples of carbon-free renewable energy. The purpose of all these methods is to combat the increase in greenhouse gas emissions and reduce our impact on the environment as a whole.
______________________________________________________
What is "
Decentralized Energy"?Decentralized Energy is the opposite of "centralized energy." Decentralized Energy energy generates the power and energy that a residential, commercial or industrial customer needs, onsite. Examples of decentralized energy production are solar energy systems and solar trigeneration energy systems.
Today's electric utility industry was "born" in the 1930's, when fossil fuel prices were cheap, and the cost of wheeling the electricity via transmission power lines, was also cheap. "Central" power plants could be located hundreds of miles from the load centers, or cities, where the electricity was needed. These extreme inefficiencies and cheap fossil fuel prices have added a considerable economic and environmental burden to the consumers and the planet.
Centralized energy is found in the form of electric utility companies that generate power from "central" power plants. Central power plants are highly inefficient, averaging only 33% net system efficiency. This means that the power coming to your home or business - including the line losses and transmission inefficiencies of moving the power - has lost 75% to as much as 80% energy it started with at the "central" power plant. These losses and inefficiencies translate into significantly increased energy expenses by the residential and commercial consumers.
Decentralized Energy is the Best Way to Generate Clean and Green Energy!How we make and distribute electricity is changing!
The electric power generation, transmission and distribution system (the electric "grid") is changing and evolving from the electric grid of the 19th and 20th centuries, which was inefficient, highly-polluting, very expensive and “dumb.”
The "old" way of generating and distributing energy resembles this slide:
The electric grid of the 21st century (see slide below) will be Decentralized, Smart, Efficient and provide "carbon free energy" and “pollution free power” to customers who remain on the electric grid. The electric grid of the future will be comprised of both Onsite Power Generation plants and "utility scale power plants" that are fueled/powered with Biomass Gasification, Biomethane, Concentrating Solar Power, B100 Biodiesel, Distributed PV, EcoGeneration Systems, Geothermal Power Plants, Synthesis Gas, Rooftop PV, Solar Cogeneration, Solar Energy Systems, Solar Power Parks, Solar Trigeneration and Wind Power Generation - located at Residential, Commercial, Industrial and City/Municipal Locations.
Some customers will choose to dis-connect from the grid entirely. (Electric grid represented by the small light blue circles in the slide below.)
The transmission grid will be upgraded to a "Unified Smart Grid" with green electrons now being wheeled via "High Voltage Direct Current."
Typical "central" power plants and the electric utility companies that own them will either be shut-down, closed or go out of business due to one or more of the following: failed business model, inordinate expenses related to central power plants that are inefficient, excessive pollution/emissions, high costs, continued reliance on the use of fossil fuels to generate energy, and the failure to provide efficient, carbon free energy and pollution free power.
Carbon free energy and pollution free power reduces our dependence on foreign oil and makes us Energy Independent while reducing and eliminating Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
* Some of the above information from the Department of Energy website with permission.
________________________________________________________
America's
"Clear and Present Danger" America
Has INCREASED its' Dependence on Foreign America
is even more "addicted" to foreign oil today, than we were in 1973 -
1974 when OPEC, Saudi Arabia and other suppliers from the Middle-East
stopped selling us their fossil fuels, and created a significant blow to our
economy.
PRODUCES:
7,460,000 bbls of oil CONSUMES:
20,800,000 bbls of oil Simply
put, about 65% of the gasoline in your car's gas tank, comes from a foreign
country. EVERY
day, the U.S. must IMPORT over 13 million bbls of oil from foreign
countries and foreign suppliers to meet demand. This
is NOT acceptable. America
needs to quickly transition to Energy Independence. Renewable
Energy is the Only Way America Can Achieve Energy Independence.
Millions
of new and sustainable American jobs would be created here at home, if we would
end our addiction to foreign fossil fuels, and quickly transition to an economy
based on renewable energy and renewable fuels, produced here in the U.S.A. The good news is that today,
America already has all of the Renewable
Energy Resources and Renewable
Energy Technologies needed to make American Energy Independence a
reality.
According
to Monty Goodell, Founder and Chairman of the Renewable
Energy Institute, "our increased dependence and reliance on foreign
energy supplies represents a Clear
and Present Danger to our national security, our economy, and the lives and
livelihood of every American. Energy - including the energy we use from
imported fossil fuels, is the very "lifeblood" of the American economy
as it is for every industrialized country. An economy dies without it's
lifeblood of energy. This Clear
and Present Danger we face is far more serious than the problems related to greenhouse
gas emissions. And while greenhouse
gas emissions are very serious issue, in the long-term, pales in comparison
to America's vital national security interests and America's economic stability
in the short term. For this reason alone, America needs to transition away
from its addiction to foreign energy supplies. And America's abundant renewable energy
resources such as the energy we receive from the sun, and renewable
energy technologies such as concentrated
solar power (CSP) plants - can supply 100% of America's power
requirements with a concentrating solar
power plant measuring 75 miles by 75 miles, located in the Southwest
U.S. By generating America's power from concentrating
solar power plants, America resolves its' short-term Clear
and Present Danger as it relates to importing its energy from foreign
countries, and the long-term problems relating to greenhouse
gas emissions." Continuing,
Mr. Goodell states that "too many Americans have forgotten what happened to
us in
1973, when the Arabs and OPEC brought the United States economy to a screeching halt
during the OPEC Oil Embargo. This happened because they (mainly the
country of Saudi Arabia)
disagreed with our foreign policy and is the reason why they "turned off the tap" of
our need for their oil supplies. When Saudi Arabia and OPEC
stopped the vital flow of oil to our country in 1973, they caused an "oil shock"
that severely and negatively impacted our economy. Mr.
Goodell's question for us to ponder is, "do these countries who sell us 60%
of our daily energy requirements, like us and our foreign policy, or might they
leverage our addiction to their fossil fuels, and turn off the tap to make us
adjust or revise our foreign policy?? Like any addict, America's foreign
policy may be held hostage to its addiction, and in this case, our addiction to
foreign oil, may over-ride our national interests."
Have
American's forgotten the gas shortages and long lines at "Apparently
so." Mr. Goodell states that "in 1973, America was 'addicted'
and 'over the barrel' of foreign oil to the amount of 40%. Forty percent
of our energy 'needs' in 1973 came from countries - many of which didn't like us
then, and I'm afraid, many of them still don't. The difference between
1973 and today - is that today we receive 50% MORE foreign oil now than we did
in 1973. And now we know about the problems relating to greenhouse
gas emissions that we didn't know then. America needs to change
course, and change course now, in terms of its' energy supplies and how we keep
America's economy strong, without the threat of being held hostage to a
middle-east tyrant or regime, that could once again, turn on us, and turn off
our supply of foreign oil."
Remember
???? "Let
me Repeat.... That
was 1973 when we imported 40% of our daily energy requirements in the form of
crude oil from overseas, and from foreign countries - and many of these from
countries that don't like us. Today,
over 35 years later, America has yet to learn the lesson. We cannot
continue our reliance on energy from foreign countries that supply us with
60% of the crude oil that our refineries use as a feedstock for producing
gasoline and diesel fuel for our cars and trucks comes from overseas. America
is "over the barrel" and it's not our barrel, but the barrels of oil
that we are addicted by and owned by other countries. Why have we not
learned the lessons we needed to learn in 1973 when we were cut-off from the
vital energy supplies we need? Countries
like China, are growing rapidly, and have an insatiable need for crude oil.
China, with their booming economy, is increasingly growing in its clout and
control over international supplies of crude oil - whether they do this through
their ability to buy as much oil as they need on a daily basis, or whether they
simply but American drilling rigs, technology, and explore and produce oil and gas from their own fields. China, is buying large amounts of oil for their country, and causing
upward pricing on declining supplies. What happens if Russia, with all of their
oil and natural gas, along with China and Venezuela, with or without the help of
OPEC, decided to NOT sell oil to us???? To
be sure, greenhouse
gas emissions are a problem, and to some, greenhouse
gas emissions are also a Clear
and Present Danger, but not to the extent that it presents an imminent Clear
and Present Danger. America's
reliance for 60% of our energy "needs" coming from foreign suppliers
is un-acceptable. The
"driver" to get America to begin reducing and eliminating fossil fuel
use should be our nation's national security and the welfare and safety of its
citizens. And this can all begin with developing and investing in our own renewable energy
resources and renewable
energy technologies, let's start by putting solar on every rooftop that has
a clear and unobstructed view of the Southern sky. See www.RooftopPV.com
or www.DistributedPV.com
for more information. Let's create incentives begin with adopting a
national "Feed In Tariff" as
Germany did in 1990. We simply do NOT have the luxury of time on our hands. We need to end our
dependence and reliance on foreign fossil fuels, especially from countries that
don't like us! We need to rapidly begin expanding renewable energy
resources and renewable
energy technologies from our vast and abundant renewable energy resources,
such as; solar, solar energy
systems, solar cogeneration,
solar trigeneration,
"solar on every roof," along with; Biomass
Gasification, B100 Biodiesel, Biomethane,
E100
Ethanol (from cellulosic, agricultural waste, sugar cane, etc., and NOT from
corn), Geothermal Power Plants,
Natural Wastewater Treatment,
Synthesis Gas, Waste
To Energy, Waste To Fuel and Wind
Power Generation where it makes economic and environmental sense."
____________________________________________________
Are
you doing your part to prevent Climate Change and End America's
Reliance on Foreign Energy?
Our following
EcoGeneration
technologies,
including our
Biomethane,
B100
Biodiesel and
Synthesis Gas Fuels
Generated from our "Waste to Fuel"
technologies are Carbon Free Energy
and Pollution Free Power
solutions that will:
*
eliminate or greatly reduce our customer's electric demand charges and electric
expenses.
* slow, stop and eventually reverse climate change by reducing and then
eliminating anthropogenic
greenhouse
gas emissions
- of which
carbon
dioxide emissions
makes up 80% of all greenhouse
gas emissions. *
reduce the need for inefficient and expensive central power plants owned by
utility companies. *
end America's dependence on oil from OPEC and other countries in the
Middle-East, Venezuela and end our need for importing natural gas from Russia.
A
Sources of Energy by 50% Since 1973.
According
to the CIA Fact Book, Every Day, the U.S.
This
Means that 65% of America's Energy Supplies are Now Imported from Suppliers
from Foreign Countries.
At
$80/barrel of oil, this also means that $1,040,000,000.00 American Dollars leave
our country, EVERY DAY, to foreign countries/suppliers of our fossil fuels, to
pay for the energy we need.
That's
$1 Billion EVERY day leaving our economy, and going to support a foreign
country's economy.
Talk
about our foreign trade deficit..... nearly $400 Billion each year, leaves our
country to pay for our oil addiction and the energy we need. To be exact,
that's $379,600,000,000.00 American Dollars.
their gas stations to get
gas during the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973?

"Sadly,
most Americans have forgotten the long lines of people waiting in their cars
- lined up and waiting
for gasoline at their nearby gas station, with lines that were many blocks
long. And, after waiting 4-5 hours, many even waiting overnight in many places, to
finally take their turn to fill up their car with gasoline, only to find that
the gas station
had run out of gas."
For more
information, call or email:![]()
* forever change the way energy is generated and used.
* reduce and eventually eliminate the use of coal and other fossil fuels.
* promote energy independence.
www.AmericanEnergyPlan.com
Anaerobic Digester
www.AnaerobicDigester.com
Anaerobic Digesters
www.AnaerobicDigesters.com
B100 Biodiesel
www.B100Biodiesel.com
Battery
Energy Storage
www.BatteryEnergyStorage.com
Biomass
Gasification
www.BiomassGasification.com
Biomethane
www.Biomethane.com
Building Automation System
www.BuildingAutomationSystem.com
Carbon
Dioxide Emissions
www.CarbonDioxideEmissions.com
Carbon Emissions
www.CarbonEmissions.com
Carbon Free Energy
www.CarbonFreeEnergy.com
Clean Power Generation
www.CleanPowerGeneration.com
Cogeneration
www.Cogeneration.net
Concentrating
Solar Power
www.ConcentratingSolarPower.com
Demand
Response Programs
www.DemandResponsePrograms.com
Distributed
PV
www.DistributedPV.com
Distributed
Solar Generation
www.DistributedSolarGeneration.com
EcoGeneration
www.EcoGeneration.com
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
www.GreenhouseGasEmissions.com
Net
Zero Energy
www.NetZeroEnergy.com
Net
Zero Energy Building
www.NetZeroEnergyBuilding.com
No Foreign Oil
www.NoForeignOil.com
Plug
In Electric Vehicles
www.PlugInElectricVehicles.com
Pollution
Free Power
www.PollutionFreePower.com
Rooftop
PV
www.RooftopPV.com
Solar Energy Systems
www.SolarEnergySystems.net
Solar Power Parks
www.SolarPowerParks.com
Solar Cogeneration
www.SolarCogeneration.com
Solar Trigeneration
www.SolarTrigeneration.com
Synthesis Gas
www.SynthesisGas.com
Trigeneration
www.Trigeneration.com
Waste Heat Recovery
www.WasteHeatRecovery.com
Waste to Energy
www.WasteToEnergy.net
Waste
To Fuel
www.WasteToFuel.com
Wind
Power Generation
www.WindPowerGeneration.com
Zero Emission Energy
www.ZeroEmissionEnergy.com
Zero Emission Power
www.ZeroEmissionPower.com
______________________________________________________
We support the Renewable Energy Institute by donating a portion of our profits to the Renewable Energy Institute in their efforts to reduce fossil fuel use through renewable energy and their goals to end fossil fuel pollution by reducing/eliminating Carbon Emissions, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
The Renewable Energy Institute is "Changing The Way The World Makes and Uses Energy by Providing Research & Development, Funding and Resources That Creates Sustainable Energy via 'Carbon Free Energy,' 'Clean Power Generation' and 'Pollution Free Power' Through Expanding the use of Renewable Energy Technologies."

![]()
www.RenewableEnergyInstitute.org
The information contained on this site is
copyright protected and
cannot be
reproduced in any form or manner without our consent.
Cadmium
Telluride
www.CadmiumTelluride.net
Renewable Energy Institute
Copyright
© 2007
All Rights Reserved